Friday, October 8, 2010

World War Z by Max Brooks

I heard Max Brooks speak at Wizard World Philly a few years ago, and of the first things he said to the assembled crowd was that “If zombies come in that door in the back of the room, it’s every man for himself. I’ve already got my plan for in here ready to go: I’m jumping off this stage, running through the door up here and barricading it so they can’t get me.” We all laughed, but kind of nervously, looking back over our shoulders to make sure there wasn’t a horde of undead flooding into the room.
There’s a great many things about this book that are interesting. It’s a lot like Romero’s films, in that there’s a social commentary element that can’t be missed (although purists would point out that technically, Romero’s “zombies” are actually ghouls, but who listens to purists? Incidentally, it was Return of the Living Dead that gave zombies their hunger for brains.) That’s what zombie stories, the good ones, anyway, are all about: holding a mirror up to the collective face of humanity and showing us what we may not want to see.
Brooks uses zombies as part of an apocalyptic scenario that he drew from historical accounts and extrapolated from his own research. Just like Zombie Survival Guide’s advice, the situations are realistic with or without zombies, though invading armies of people are less fun and maybe easier to deal with.
There were various responses to the outbreak in the book, but the two that interested me the most was the Redeker chapter and the one about the dogs, but for very different reasons.
The Redeker Plan chapter showed that sometimes when people need to go to extremes to survive the apocalypse, even if they save lives by doing something hard and cruel, there's still a high price to pay. This guy was so upset by the plan he'd come up with that it's execution actually drove him insane and made him want to be another person because he couldn't actually live with having come up with it. I was surprised when we learned at the end of the chapter that the person talking about Redeker was actually Redeker himself.
The chapter about the zombie sniffing dogs showed that despite the harshness of the new world that people lived in, some men and women would still value not only human but animal life as well. Despite how much the world had changed, some things didn't.
The zombies in this book serve more as a way to show the reader how the nations of the world and how individual characters will react to their threat, than a monster on their own terms. While I thought this was an effective use, it made them sort of boring as actual opponents, compared to a book like Monster Island by David Wellington, where the undead become much more than a mindless menace. Still, for what Brooks was attempting to do, I think the zombies as presented were effective.
There apparently, is supposed to be a movie coming out, though the script seems to be in rewrite limbo at the moment.
The audio book version is excellent, with many famous people doing the voices for various people in the book. Listening to it adds a level of authenticity that reading just doesn't generate. There's a graphic novel as well, but it only has select stories in it.

6 comments:

Alexa Grave said...

I also like the Redeker interview. I didn't expect the twist at the end either, but it worked nicely. The whole dispassionate label is shattered when we find out that Redeker mentally broke from devising something that would sacrifice many lives.

-Lori

Kari Cooper said...

I enjoyed your comments about the Redeker interview, because you're right. Doing something that will sacrifice many lives to save other lives is a very realistic but scary thing. That's one of the things I liked best about this book...it wasn't just the zombies that caused problems. And they weren't necessarily the only bad thing about the apocalypse.

Leadie said...

Hey Paul, thanks for the info on the audio. That's one I would be interested and can see where it would be better than the book. The fact that you didn't get a fulfilling ending to each of the interviews was something that drove me nuts. But that is the realism of historical information, you don't always get the entire story but bits and pieces. And I did love the Redeker part as well and Colonel Elliotson. Two of Brooks strong points with this story are the knowledge of the world and the psychology of people. Now I need to find the audio.

Scott A. Johnson said...

The dog thing got to me. Oh...and remember...If we're being chased by zombies, I'm tripping you. You don't have to be the fastest person in your group...just not the slowest.

KL Grady said...

Brooks would barricade himself and refuse others entrance because he's a jackass. Just sayin'. And he said at ComicCon SD that Brad Pitt had signed on to play the lead role if the movie ever gets made....

I'm not sure I'd want to see the movie, though. This is the second time I've read WWZ, and this time through was not so hot. I really liked it the first time, and I want to hang on to those memories of an enjoyable read. Seeing the movie might means finding more issues with the choices Brooks made and taking the story down a notch it can't afford to lose.

On the zombies: couldn't agree more. They were a bland vehicle and not at all the story's monsters.

Kristin said...

Being bland is what zombies do best! A crazy human is unpleasant, but if you're trapped with a crazy human and can't go outside because there are legions of the undead, then the tension is that much higher. The zombie apocalypse forces humanity to regress, modern technology and niceties are stripped away, and dealing with what's left is the real meat in most zombie books. The actual zombies are more like icing on the terror-cake. (mmmm...terror-cake)

Kristin